[CodeMe]

Up

0

Down

Hmm,
I quite like it. We’d have to change the way we collect the data, and sort the pools. Perhaps this would also allow us to aggregate the data further down the road.

Thanks for the suggestion!

• This reply was modified 2 weeks, 3 days ago by CodeMe.

• This reply was modified 2 weeks, 3 days ago by CodeMe.

[CodeMe]

Up

0

Down

We gotta have some lore behind the logo man. Maybe the squares with little squares mean sometihng too?

[CodeMe]

Up

1

Down

We could potentially add a section with coins that are seeing a surge in transactions when our ethereum node is synced.

[CodeMe]

Up

1

Down

I do quite like this idea. With some moderate-heavy number crunching we could really get a digital pseudo-ID card of every active address on the ethereum blockchain. We could look at traits of addresses in other coins and compute a likeliness-to-hold value for each address, which could be displayed next to each purchase of a coin. I’d suggest this would be a tier 2 or 3 feature. What are everyone elses thoughts on this?

[CodeMe]

Up

2

Down

Yeah I’m not a big fan of transaction fees on an already expensive blockchain, which I’m also not sure would be able to be implemented at this point since the contract is already implemented. It is true that it’s important to increase the amount of positive inflow to the project above the 0.3% that we’re collecting from the liquidity pool (though this can be a pretty nice chunk of change after a while). As Jake noted above, we can charge a price for our service in various ways, though we are of course always open for you guys to create proposals.

[Author]

Posts